Language Translation & Interpretation Blog

Interpreting Services - In-Person, Phone, and Video

Written by Vicki Morehouse | June 25, 2024

You’ve decided you need an interpreter to assist you in communicating with your client or patient; now it’s time to determine what type of interpreting service would work best. In-person, phone, and video interpreting are great options, but each is appropriate in a different scenario.

Here are some factors that may help you decide which format will work for your needs:

In-Person Interpreting

PROS:

  • Helpful if you need an interpreter for an extended period.
  • Easier for reviewing complex content or when things need to be explained in great detail.
  • No need for technology like a computer, a tablet, or other hardware.
  • Better for going over sensitive information like mental health, or end of life, or surgery.
  • Good choice when using visual cues or if body language is important.
  • More personal.

CONS:

  • Slightly more expensive since person has to be there. You may have to pay for a minimum number of hours and travel expenses.
  • Availability can be an issue. Is the language you need available in the area?  Is there an interpreter available at the time you need them?
  • Appointments must be made in advance.

Phone Interpreting

PROS:

  • Perfect option for short notice, quick appointments.
  • Good for calling patients or clients to give lab results or make appointments.
  • Most inexpensive option as calls are billed by minute with no minimum charge.
  • Every language can be accessed.

CONS:

  • Impersonal for both parties.
  • No visual cues available.
  • Must speak into the phone, which is limiting in many scenarios. Speaker phone can be hard to hear.
  • Confusing for interpreter if there is more than one person in the room.

Video Interpreting

PROS:

  • This service is great for emergency rooms or minute clinics where people don't have appointments.
  • It bridges the gap between the personal touch of in-person interpreting and phone interpreting.
  • Typically, it’s less expensive than on-site interpreting - smaller time minimums and no travel charges.
  • Offers enhanced accuracy over phone interpreting because you can see facial expressions and some visual cues.
  • Available on short notice, and more languages are available because they don't have to be local.

CONS:

  • Technology is required; a computer, tablet, or special equipment. If technology isn't working correctly, the appointment will not be feasible.
  • Internet hook-up speed must meet specific requirements.
  • Possible delay or lag which could affect the flow of conversation.
  • The interpreter can't see everything happening in the room, so some cues may be missed.
  • Difficulty positioning camera for best view of everyone in the room.
  • Possibly not hearing everything if people aren't speaking directly into the microphone. Details could be missed.
  • Set up costs involved.